Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 February 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on Local Government.


Local Government

My hon. Friend chooses to ignore the majority of the ratepayers of Cheshire on the grounds that they are all Tories. He may take that view, but it is not reflected in the facts. Disaggregation of the county council's engineering services will duplicate activities and increase costs, and the waste problem will increase enormously—quite apart from the difficulty involved in dividing the assets. I could go on to describe the problems that will be caused to trading standards and staff, and the real problems involved in disaggregating county-based services. I have been alone in this, and it has been convenient for some of my colleagues to suggest that I have been seduced by the arguments of a Conservative county council. I have been here for a long time, and it takes a bit of effort for any man to seduce me, particularly when it comes to politics and economics. I reflect the views of those who have consistently expressed to me their anger and astonishment at the way in which the issue has been handled, and their total disbelief that a Labour Government could proceed with a project that is neither affordable nor supported, which does not provide value for money, and which will not fulfil the criteria that were originally set out. I can only say that I am astounded by this behaviour. I am astounded that we are putting my constituency and those of other Members through the mangle at enormous speed by telling them that they must run for a shadow authority—that they must come up with conclusions, and that they must then go forward to elections to a shadow authority which is not capable of working together and where the two particular committees that have been brought together will find it extraordinarily difficult to come up with any sensible views. I believe above all that the Minister should have had the guts to say tonight, ““We wanted to do this.”” The Secretary of State wanted to do it and took this decision, and has never given a political or economic reason or any argument that would stand up to examination. I cannot believe that this is going ahead, but if it does, it will not do so with my support.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c1051 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Local government Reorganisation Unitary councils Cheshire
Legislation
Cheshire (Structural Changes) Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk