Proceeding contribution from Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 March 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill.
Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill
If the family is quite rightly stigmatised as the result of a closure order, will the vulnerable adult also be stigmatised as being, for instance, intentionally homeless, or will that elderly person be treated as someone who has been made unintentionally homeless and therefore as a priority for accommodation? A rather rigid approach, or the approach that the family has caused this, might take the blameless along with the blameworthy.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c1310
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal proceedings Criminal investigation Administration of justice Armed forces Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Hospitals Inspections Immigration Drugs Human trafficking Misconduct NHS Police Pay Prisons Public sector Misuse Police authorities Standards Young people Strikes Anti-social behaviour orders Armed Forces' Pay Review Body Prison Service Pay Review Body
- Legislation
- Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:58:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453370
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453370
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_453370