Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].


Climate Change Bill [HL]

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response. Given the very positive view that he gave in Committee of this type of move, I am disappointed that there has been no further movement and that the Government have not been able to come up with anything more substantial. I absolutely stand by the depoliticisation quote, which was in the context of the Committee on Climate Change bypassing the Secretary of State and effectively implementing policy, whereas here—and I have tabled amendments on exactly this basis—I am saying that the committee should assess government programmes to see whether they will meet the objectives. Therefore, I am disappointed by the Minister’s response. I think that adaptation must be brought up one or two more leagues in the Bill due to its importance. I am a convert to that but I think that the Government remain to be converted, and I wish to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 131) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 160; Not-Contents, 137.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c1446 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Aviation Climate change Committees Environment protection EU emissions trading scheme Standards Carbon emissions Shipping Climate Change Committee Greenhouse gas emissions Methane
Legislation
Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk