Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 31 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].


Climate Change Bill [HL]

My Lords, with respect to the noble Lord, Lord Taylor—I know the work that he has done on this—I still do not really understand why the amendment is necessary. Clause 25(1) refers to a figure of at least 70 per cent. Throughout our discussions on this subject, we have stated that this relates purely to the targets and does not affect any trading systems; nor does it affect the Government’s ability to purchase external credits under the clean development mechanism, the Kyoto mechanisms or the ETS, although the latter is primarily a commercial scheme. If they wish to do so, that is completely within their powers. The clause simply uses the words ““at least”” with an accounting target in the UK carbon account. It does not need to reflect any other actions by government or commercial companies. Therefore, from these Benches we would find it strange if the amendment were needed. The fact that Clause 25 is clear and simple is what commends it most. Having said that, I agree with the clarification, although I do not think it is necessary to put it in the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c759 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Accountability Companies Climate change Civil service Environment protection Pollution control Standards Carbon emissions Departmental coordination Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Climate Change Committee Greenhouse gas emissions UK emissions trading scheme
Legislation
Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk