Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jim Murphy (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 April 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Global Security (Russia).


Global Security (Russia)

It is deeply disappointing that ODIHR was not able to oversee and monitor the elections. Although parliamentarians can witness and monitor elections, they can do so only for relatively short periods, and there is no substitute for the long-term, detailed, pre-election monitoring, and the monitoring of the election and its aftermath. That work should be carried out by ODIHR. A country as proud as Russia naturally is, with so much to offer the world, is belittled by not being open and allowing such monitoring. It is deeply disappointing. It is important that we are clear about what we want from our relationship with Russia and that we recognise the wide range of foreign policy and global challenges on which we could make a valuable contribution by working more closely with Russia. Such an open and honest dialogue allows us to achieve our international objectives and to speak up when we disagree with Russia. It is a balanced approach, aligned to British and international interests, and I hope that the House will support it. The House will continue to return to the issue, and some of the specifics that we have not had the opportunity to discuss today are deserving of further debate and consideration. Finally, I wish once again to put on record the Government's appreciation of the remarkably detailed work that the Foreign Affairs Committee has undertaken on the matter. Question put and agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
474 c353-4WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Diplomatic service Investment International relations Energy supply EU action Politics and government Terrorism Security NATO Russia British Council
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk