Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 24 April 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL].


House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL]

The fact that the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, has had to propose an amendment to a Bill put forward by someone on his own Benches—indeed, he said that his noble friend had asked him to put it down—raises a question about how much thought went into the Bill in the first place. That seems particularly unacceptable in a week when this House has sat until midnight more than once to consider issues of fundamental importance on a government Bill, showing how scarce and valuable the House’s time is. It would have been better to have got it right the first time. I think I understand where the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, is coming from, but Amendments Nos. 3 and 5, which would allow those working in an official capacity to retain membership of your Lordship’s House—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c1748-9 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Civil servants Channel Islands Employment EU countries House of Lords Exemptions International organisations Isle of Man Domicil Peers Non-departmental public bodies Personal taxation Migrant workers Taxation
Legislation
House of Lords (Members' Taxation Status) Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk