Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 24 April 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL].


House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL]

Does the noble Lord think that the solution is to have a prescribed list? Normally, it is the role of opposition amendments to suggest lists, which Governments always resist, because by listing some organisations you exclude others. That is a well-known principle, which noble Lords opposite no doubt argued from this side of the Chamber when they were in government. It may be that in this case—I should be interested in the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart—a prescribed list, amendable by affirmative order, might be an appropriate way to go forward.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c1751-2 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Civil servants Channel Islands Employment EU countries House of Lords Exemptions International organisations Isle of Man Domicil Peers Non-departmental public bodies Personal taxation Migrant workers Taxation
Legislation
House of Lords (Members' Taxation Status) Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk