Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Broads Authority Bill (By Order).


Broads Authority Bill (By Order)

I am not sure whether the hon. Gentleman has just arrived, but I had made the point about Scotland. However, I am grateful for the intervention and he is right to say that the experience appears to be positive. The critical issue from the authority's point of view is that it has not caused problems in the administration of those national parks, but given local communities a direct say in it. It is fair to point out that there are several different interests in a national park. One is a broad national interest. I fully accept the case for national nominees on a national park board or the Broads Authority board. That is legitimate. However, it is also legitimate for the communities in the area of a national park or the Broads Authority to have a direct say in the decision-making process. The interests that they want to promote may be parochial, but they should be considered as part of the overall mix in making decisions.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
475 c789 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountability Councillors Finance Elections Flood control Inland waterways Navigation Powers Membership Parish and town councils Safety Shipping Dredging Broads Authority Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
Legislation
Broads Authority Bill 2006-07 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk