Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Shaw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Broads Authority Bill (By Order).
Broads Authority Bill (By Order)
I am coming to that point. In the case of the two national parks in Scotland—the Cairngorms national park and the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs national park—a percentage of authority members are directly elected. That appears to work well. I do not want us to lose the opportunity to have that discussion. It has been suggested that such a scheme be piloted in the broads, but we know that the process has worked well in Scotland, so one could say that there has already been a pilot. I want to look at the issue across the piece, because it is not only the Broads Authority that is affected. I want to understand the views of the other park authorities in England, and the views of the many people who have an interest in our national parks. The parks are not just local; they are national treasures. My constituents in Chatham have as much right to a say on how the parks are formed as someone who lives in the Lake district, for example.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 475 c801
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Councillors Finance Elections Flood control Inland waterways Navigation Powers Membership Parish and town councils Safety Shipping Dredging Broads Authority Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
- Legislation
- Broads Authority Bill 2006-07 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:14:07 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_470181
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_470181
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_470181