Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

I thank the Minister for that reply. As with so many of her answers, although I realise that they are intended to be helpful, it sits against the backdrop of the Bill as it is. Anybody looking at Clause 42 sees a range of health providers in there and one mention of adult social services. The reason for tabling these amendments was, again, to try to rebalance the legislation towards social care. I am afraid that that must be done. It is vital that the CQC carries on the good work of CSCI with the Audit Commission, which has brought about a new level of measurement and assessment of social care services. That risks being overshadowed if it is not explicit in the legislation, which it is not. I take the point about allowing a degree of flexibility, but were the CQC not to be involved on an annual basis with comprehensive area assessments then the resulting documents would be somewhat lacking. However, I have listened to what the Minister has to say and, on that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
701 c234-5GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Devolved matters Care homes Audit Cross border cooperation Health services ICT Disease control Infectious diseases Health education NHS Mental health services Standards Regulation Wales Social services Healthcare Commission Commission for Social Care Inspection Care Quality Commission
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk