Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 21 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

I am most grateful for the Minister’s clarification. I can see that the wording of my amendment would almost impose micromanagement, which would certainly not be appropriate. I feel somewhat reassured by the assurances that are on the record about how the council should work and what must be in the annual reports. However, I should like to pick up on two important points raised by the noble Earl, Lord Howe, in relation to investigation. I wonder whether that part of the clause needs to be reworded to provide clarification for just the same reasons. The current wording almost implies the potential for micromanagement and suggests that something could be used later in an appeal against a decision. My other concern relates to the devolved Administrations. I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Cumberlege, as I am usually pretty vigilant about devolved Administrations and I missed a trick here. I can see that there would be merit in not only referring to consultation but saying that there must be agreement between the Health Ministers in the devolved Administrations, because health is devolved. The overseeing of the registration of healthcare professionals is a UK-wide responsibility and requires consistency across the whole of the UK for the way in which they work, in whichever system they work. We have four different healthcare systems emerging now, so if the Secretary of State had powers left in here I would wish the Secretary of State to have to consult. I feel that I have to defend my Minister of Health in the National Assembly for Wales, with whom I had a constructive meeting yesterday and who is very engaged in issues for healthcare professions at a local level within Wales. It would be hard, within a devolved pattern of healthcare delivery, to find that there was a consultation but that, even if the Minister disagreed strongly, something was somehow imposed. But with those caveats around the amendments that are not mine, I shall not press my amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
701 c550GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Disclosure of information Dental services Criminal proceedings Civil proceedings Cooperation Dentistry General Medical Council Health services Fees and charges Health professions HIV/AIDS General practitioners Misconduct NHS Magistrates' courts Non-departmental public bodies Registration Standards Regulation Social workers Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence General Dental Council Hearing Aid Council Statutory instruments
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2007-08
National Assembly for Wales (Disqualification) Order 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk