Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.


Housing and Regeneration Bill

I sympathise with the proposal but add a word of caution. I heard what the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, said, and there is clearly a problem, but the people who bought the properties presumably thought that they were escaping from the inclusiveness of the original arrangement. If we do this, we will make the regulatory process more complex. It would be inappropriate to have blanket regulations applying to somebody who had bought their way out and had only a residual liability in respect of estate development. One would have to draft regulations to take account of the variations in tenure, which would make them more complicated; but the amendment would make that necessary.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c216GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Council housing Housing Land Human rights Housing associations Housing Corporation Landlord and tenant Local government Ownership Low incomes Public appointments Registration Standards Regulation Wales Social rented housing Transitional arrangements Rented housing Regeneration Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority
Legislation
Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk