Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Rosindell (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 June 2008. It occurred during Topical debate on Dangerous Dogs.


Dangerous Dogs

I agree with the hon. Gentleman. Does he accept that one of the flaws of the 1991 Act is how it has been implemented? Dogs have often been seized quite unnecessarily and locked up for long periods in cruel conditions, which has caused great distress to the families and the animal. Does the hon. Gentleman think that a reform is needed so that action can be taken in stages? In that way, small deeds could be dealt with by small penalties rather than, as has frequently happened, by having dogs seized, put down or taken away from their owners unnecessarily, which leads to great distress.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
477 c507 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Animal welfare Crime Animals Animal breeding Cooperation Licensing Dogs Local government Police Safety
Legislation
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk