Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Slynn of Hadley (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 June 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2008.


Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2008

My Lords, it is plain that Governments have to deal with acts of terrorism. It is no less obvious—if it is not, it should be—that no one should be put on or remain on a proscribed list unless there is clear evidence to establish it. The very strong judgments of the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, the Court of Appeal and indeed the European Court of First Instance made it utterly plain that justice required the PMOI to be taken off the list. There can be no doubt about that. Secondly, it is of great importance that if, as I trust, this order proposed by the Minister is approved tonight both by your Lordships and by the other place, it will do a great deal to establish and underline the concept of the rule of law. To have two such excellent judgments in this country by eminent judges so clearly stated and not to approve them would be the most dreadful attack on the concept of the rule of law. I am very glad that the Minister was able to come and do this tonight. I strongly endorse his proposal that this order should be made. I would like to thank him for the clarification in his newspaper article this morning which, to me at any rate, came as a bit of a surprise. The Minister has done a great deal to take away my surprise. Therefore, I support this order.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c1305-6 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crime prevention Proscribed organisations Terrorism Iran Mujahedin-e Khalq
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk