Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 June 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
I can see that those circumstances might arise, and I do not see that they would be precluded. This clause says right at the start that, "““An employer contravenes this section if the employer takes any action for the sole or main purpose of … inducing a worker””," and so on. If they originally took that action to induce a worker, the matter has been rectified and the worker has been enrolled but then decides to opt out, I do not fundamentally see a problem with that. There would be issues regarding evidence and the facts and circumstances of a specific case, but the opt-out should not be precluded in the circumstances the noble Lord suggests.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c58-9
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Devolved matters Crime Company liquidations Administration Cooperation Inspections Fixed penalties Employers' contributions Fines Powers of entry Northern Ireland Workplace pensions Pensions Regulation Take-up Revenue and Customs Pensions Regulator Pensions Regulator Tribunal National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 12:48:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488179
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488179
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488179