Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
Although the noble Baroness’s warnings about gobbling up all private sector saving in this country as we know it, or whatever the warnings were, do not curdle my blood and I think that they were a bit overdone, I agree with her that we do not need this extraordinary self-liquidating subsection at the end of the clause. I put it to the Minister that you can always set very high limits if you want. The Secretary of State can say that the limit is £1 million—you can have any limit you want. Therefore, I find it very odd to set out the contribution limits and then to say, ““But we may just blow this whole thing up after all””. So, like the noble Baroness, I cannot see that this subsection is appropriate and I support the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c300
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Audit Advisory services Conflict of interests Government assistance Low incomes Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Non-departmental public bodies Unfair dismissal Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 12:49:59 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489490
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489490
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489490