Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
Perhaps I could suggest to the noble Lord that if there has to be an absolute ban for the reasons so given, the tenure advisory guidance should be between eight and 12. If there has to be an absolute ban, perhaps the Minister would consider whether it could be two re-appointments rather than oneāthat is to say, an absolute ban on 12 years rather than eight.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c330
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Audit Advisory services Conflict of interests Government assistance Low incomes Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Non-departmental public bodies Unfair dismissal Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 12:50:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489527
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489527
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489527