Proceeding contribution from Lord Richard (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill.
Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill
Not for the first time in my political life, I am absolutely bemused by the attitude of the Liberal party. Is the noble Lord seriously suggesting that he will divide the Committee on an amendment when we have had a discussion whose main feature has been comity across the party lines and consensus? Does he not consider that this is emergency legislation? Does he also not consider that if his amendment were passed—I do not think that it will be; he does not think that it will be either, in which case it is an exercise in demonstration rather than anything else—it would have to go down the other end again and come back up here? We might even be playing ping-pong between the Houses when this is urgent legislation which everybody is agreed is needed. The noble Lord would be doing himself and his party a grave disservice, let alone that which he would be doing to the country.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c1126
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Common law Intimidation Protection Property Magistrates' courts New Zealand Witnesses Trials
- Legislation
- Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:30:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492574
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492574
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_492574