Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

My Lords, I think the record will show that I said I did not accept that there was a public service obligation and that I did not think that the Government could establish it. Our position is that there should be no subsidy for personal accounts. Whatever language is used to reach that position does not much matter—it is a fairly basic position. We have to leave it at that. As I said, this is not the way I would have liked to finish today’s proceedings but it is important that we make our initial view clear. We have not been persuaded. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 60 and 61 not moved.] Clause 78 [Principles]: [Amendments Nos. 62 and 63 not moved.] Clause 80 [Finance]: [Amendment No. 64 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c225-6 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Costs Contributions Finance Government assistance Pay Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Personal pensions Non-departmental public bodies Pension funds Pension rights Trusts Personal Accounts Delivery Authority Pension accounts
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk