Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 17 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning and Energy Bill.
Planning and Energy Bill
I am very worried about the prospective application of the amendment. My hon. Friend has referred to an Act of Parliament that has already gone through, and I can understand why we should perhaps not refer to it by name in an amendment to the Bill. However, he has also referred to other Bills that have not yet passed through the House. Would it not be more appropriate to amend those Bills as they go through the House, so that we are not legislating prospectively, and to refer in this Bill only to the Act that has already gone through?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 480 c1039
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conservation Climate change Environment protection Energy Local government Planning Standards Renewable energy Carbon emissions
- Legislation
- Planning and Energy Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:58:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501050
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501050
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501050