Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].


Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]

My Lords, I want to emulate the noble Lord, Lord Alton, by keeping moderation as the tone of the debate. He set a good example at the beginning of this Session. I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in the debate for the issues they have raised. Now is not the time for an academic seminar. I resist strongly the suggestion that this is intended to be a wrecking amendment. I am conscious that many social lives will be wrecked if we prolong this debate too long, but we are engaging in legitimate due parliamentary process at this time and that is why I am pursuing the matter. There is a major moral issue here, a major debate. I have heard enough discomfort around the Chamber and I would like to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 36A) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 51; Not-Contents, 121. On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1644-5 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Civil partnerships Adoption Animals Congenital abnormalities Fertility Homosexuality Licensing Human embryo experiments Diseases Genetics EU law Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Fathers Medical treatments Mental capacity Standards Research Registration Storage Surrogacy Stem cells Human-animal hybrid embryos
Legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk