Proceeding contribution from Baroness Knight of Collingtree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]
My Lords, at this time of night I will be very brief, but I must use my right of rebuttal to reply to some very serious points. I thank those who have supported me in this debate. I share the respect held for the noble Lord, Lord Walton, in all parts of this House. He said, perfectly correctly, that the medical ethics committee of the BMA had debated the consent exemptions for children and for tissue already in storage and considered them to be reasonable. But I am told in a letter, which arrived only today, that the BMA does not have a policy on the use of tissue.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c1672
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Civil partnerships Adoption Animals Congenital abnormalities Fertility Homosexuality Licensing Human embryo experiments Diseases Genetics EU law Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Fathers Medical treatments Mental capacity Standards Research Registration Storage Surrogacy Stem cells Human-animal hybrid embryos
- Legislation
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:20:11 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504727
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504727
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504727