Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 December 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Royal Mail.


Royal Mail

I look forward to reading the Hooper report, which should have come out last week, just before I visited my local delivery offices where people wanted to know about their future. This is a massive industry in which 30,000 to 40,000 people have already lost their jobs. I have some questions. What does it mean to say that the pension fund would be reduced substantially? If a burden is left that chokes up the new arrangement, the problem will not be solved. From my information as secretary of the Communication Workers Union in this House, I understand that TNT runs on a part-time basis. It brought in technology and paid off all its full-time workers, so that people get 22-hour contracts. Is that the future for post office workers? The Minister says that it is a package. It is a curate's egg, and the question is whether people will swallow it—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
485 c972-3 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Industrial relations Finance Private sector Post offices Pension funds Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Regulation Royal Mail Postal Services Sector Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk