Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 23 January 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on House of Lords (Members' Taxation Status) Bill [HL].


House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL]

My Lords, as far as I am concerned, Members of this House should pay full British taxes and that is an end to it. This is a Second Reading debate, and we have had a good discussion of the principles. I have tried to keep it on principles and not personalities and there is an important issue here. I am disappointed by the Government’s reaction. They may not like the Bill—and I can understand that and that they might want to amend it—but I am disappointed that we are still hearing the argument that, because the Budget two years ago said that there would be no substantial change in the position of non-doms, that somehow stops a long overdue reform of this House, which would be minor in terms of the overall number of non-doms here and is almost a self-regulatory issue. I cannot see that that is a sensible excuse to hide behind, so I am disappointed. If the Government do believe in making these changes, I wish that they would get on with it. I would be happy to work with them, but I am disappointed at the tone, which seems to suggest kicking this into the long grass. I hope that as the Bill progresses we will move forward.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c1874 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information House of Lords Eligibility Domicil Public appointments Privacy Peers Overseas residence Temporary employment Tax avoidance Taxation Overseas workers Leave of absence
Legislation
House of Lords (Members' Taxation Status) Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk