Proceeding contribution from Jack Straw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 January 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Coroners and Justice Bill.
Coroners and Justice Bill
We endeavoured to reflect exactly what my right hon. Friend is seeking in clause 102(11), which states:"““the Council must have regard to the following matters””" and includes, in paragraph (d),"““the cost of different sentences””" —that is the point that my right hon. Friend wanted to take up—"““and their relative effectiveness in preventing re-offending””." That provision is aimed at meeting exactly my right hon. Friend's concerns.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c57
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Data protection Bail Administration of justice Armed forces Death Certification Coroners Juries Electronic surveillance Homosexuality Evidence ICT Incitement Homicide Health professions Internet Discrimination Ethnic groups Freedom of expression Personal records Prisons Mental capacity Pornography Offences against children Sentencing Registration Young people Security Witnesses Victims Technology Suicide Sentencing Council for England and Wales Information sharing
- Legislation
- Coroners and Justice Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-04 09:28:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522930
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522930
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522930