Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Alun Michael (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 January 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Coroners and Justice Bill.


Coroners and Justice Bill

Does the hon. Gentleman agree with me about how the provisions of proposed new section 50A(4) apply? It requires that the"““sharing of information enabled by the order is necessary to secure a relevant policy objective””," which is, I think, the point that he has made quite strongly. However, it goes on to require that"““the effect of the provision made by the order is proportionate to that policy objective””—" and, and this is my point, that—"““the provision made by the order strikes a fair balance between the public interest and the interests of any person affected by it.””" In other words, the requirement for balance in coming to a conclusion about whether data should be shared is clearly written into the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c62-3 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Data protection Bail Administration of justice Armed forces Death Certification Coroners Juries Electronic surveillance Homosexuality Evidence ICT Incitement Homicide Health professions Internet Discrimination Ethnic groups Freedom of expression Personal records Prisons Mental capacity Pornography Offences against children Sentencing Registration Young people Security Witnesses Victims Technology Suicide Sentencing Council for England and Wales Information sharing
Legislation
Coroners and Justice Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk