Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Murrison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 29 January 2009. It occurred during Debate on Armed Forces Personnel.


Armed Forces Personnel

In fact, they do not always necessarily get the 24 hours. Perhaps the picture is mixed: some get rather longer, some less. The point that I am trying to make is that if we are providing two weeks' decompression for one group of people and 24 hours for another group, there is clearly a very big difference between them. They probably cannot both be right. It would be good to try to work out what is best practice in relation to decompression. One thing that we can agree on is that decompression is a welcome innovation. It appears particularly to improve domestic harmony among returnees, but we could perhaps look a little more into the question of precisely how it is played out.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c514 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Compensation Armed forces Deployment Coroners Housing Health services Iraq Gurkhas Offenders Pay Radiation exposure Peacekeeping operations Staff Personnel management Mental health services Rehabilitation Schools Training War pensions Afghanistan Post-traumatic stress disorder Veterans
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk