Proceeding contribution from Ed Balls (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 February 2009. It occurred during Opposition day on Child Protection.
Child Protection
My hon. Friend is right. That is why we publish those reviews. We have also said that executive summaries should have a clear view of all the lessons learned from every individual case. In fact, we have asked Lord Laming to tell us how we can make those reports better in future. In the case of baby P, it is important that there is a full and better executive summary in the public domain. The reason why I am not making them public is not because of the advice to me from the Information Commissioner. As I have made clear on repeated occasions in writing and in this House, I did not seek his advice on this matter. It is my judgment—because the professionals tell me so, not only the lawyers but the NSPCC and the deputy children's commissioner—that such disclosure would put children's lives at risk. This is not something to play politics with but something on which there should be a consensus. I think that it is time that we got off this subject and on to the serious business.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c786
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Databases Children in care Abuse Bureaucracy ICT Inspections Protection Offences against children Standards Social services Vacancies Social workers Victoria Climbié Death Inquiry Ofsted
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:24:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_525989
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_525989
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_525989