Proceeding contribution from David Laws (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Rose Report.
Rose Report
Let me finish this point, because I may be being unfair to Rose and the hon. Gentleman may wish to defend him in a second. There is a lack of clarity about themes, about what will happen to subject teaching, about the role of facts and individual understanding of subjects such as history and geography, and about whether the suggestions will undermine a more traditional approach to education, in which youngsters are expected to engage with facts, allowing them an understanding that they can use to exploit the many information-providing vehicles that are available in the modern age.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c353WH
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Children Assessments Curriculum Languages Qualifications and Curriculum Authority National curriculum tests Primary education Standards Schools Teachers Special educational needs Science Speech and language therapy Communication skills Literacy Teaching methods Mathematics Numeracy Primary Curriculum Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:10:51 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528266
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528266
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528266