Proceeding contribution from Nick Gibb (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Rose Report.
Rose Report
That is fine, but the consultation is taking place after the report has said that parents have a certain view. It is asserting views for which there is no evidence. That is what concerns me about the quality of the evidence on which the report is based. It seems to be based on assertion, not evidence.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c361WH
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Children Assessments Curriculum Languages Qualifications and Curriculum Authority National curriculum tests Primary education Standards Schools Teachers Special educational needs Science Speech and language therapy Communication skills Literacy Teaching methods Mathematics Numeracy Primary Curriculum Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:10:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528281
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528281
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528281