Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Rose Report.


Rose Report

A fundamental disagreement with the hon. Member for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton concerns the importance of cross-curricular education. Part of Jim Rose's work considered how the primary curriculum in England compares with that of other countries. The QCA contributed to that work by providing an analysis of 10 countries that have changed their primary curriculum since 2005. Of those 10 countries, eight chose to group learning around areas rather than individual subjects, including France, Spain, Germany, New Zealand and Scotland. Their rationale for the change emphasised the need to improve the transition to primary school and deepening understanding of core areas by integrating different parts of the curriculum and developing connections between them. Although the report highlighted a tremendous amount of support for a national curriculum framework, it was agreed that the primary curriculum as it stands is outdated for pupils and slightly unwieldy for teachers with its 10 subject areas. That rationale, which other countries have adopted, lies behind Jim Rose's recommendation to group individual subjects into six areas of learning and understanding. I want to make it absolutely clear that we are not seeking to abolish subject areas from the curriculum. Children will still learn about important individuals, groups and events that have shaped our past, our culture and our communities.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c361WH 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Children Assessments Curriculum Languages Qualifications and Curriculum Authority National curriculum tests Primary education Standards Schools Teachers Special educational needs Science Speech and language therapy Communication skills Literacy Teaching methods Mathematics Numeracy Primary Curriculum Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk