Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].


Health Bill [HL]

I do not wish to spend tremendous time on this group of amendments because to some extent the point has already been made. There was wide scepticism about the nature of the pilots in social care and the extent to which they genuinely reflected the concerns of different client groups within social care. Scepticism also arose from the department’s response to the IBSEN review. If one were to read the press release that went with it, one would be tempted to see the pilots as having been an unqualified success. Yet when one studies the report in detail, there is a great deal in it that shows that there are issues that are yet to be fully and adequately addressed, and there are some differences that are capable of interpretation in different ways. My amendments are an attempt to say that when it comes to piloting individual budgets in healthcare, where there is not only a far greater number of client groups but also different categories of patients, there is a need to make sure that we have different demographic and geographic pilots that encompass all those differences. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c245GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Care homes Carers Costs Advisory services Complementary medicine Direct payments Fraud Health services Finance NHS Medical treatments Patients Pilot schemes Payments Mental capacity Primary care trusts Mental health services Midwives Maternity services Training Social services Personal budgets
Legislation
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk