Proceeding contribution from Lord Naseby (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
There is no point in having a debate in Committee when we both refer to the same survey and one refers to returns of 227 per cent which must be apportioned—the noble Baroness is a scientist—down to 100 per cent. Therefore it is 7.5 per cent. Furthermore, is she not encouraged that that is one-third down on the previous survey in 2004? It is too high, I agree, but let us have the right figure.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c414GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Advertising Age Canada Health services Health hazards Health authorities NHS Northern Ireland Proof of identity New Zealand Young people Shops Tobacco Smuggling Iceland Vending machines
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:17:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535770
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535770
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535770