Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Cathcart (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for that. I will start in reverse order and thank him for explaining the definitions of England and Wales, including the English and Welsh inshore regions. He made them very clear. Like my noble friend Lady Carnegy, I am not completely sure about his explanation of Amendment A214, which refers to someone who has taken, ""all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence"." However, I would like to read what he said and think about it. I am stuck on the first part of the Minister’s answer. I talked about third-country vessels. Perhaps I was being thick or not listening attentively, because I did not understand the Minister’s answer. The Royal Yachting Association says that the exemption, ""unfairly and unreasonably prejudices UK and member State vessels"." The Royal Yachting Association went on, as the Minister did, to cite Article 56 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. That implies that the UK can go after third-country vessels. What does the Minister say? Is the Bill unfair to UK vessels or does the convention hold sway? That is where I am stuck.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c1254 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conservation Coastal areas Byelaws Fisheries Environment protection EU law Fishing vessels Fines Public bodies Nature conservation Marine animals National parks Shipping Seas and oceans Wildlife Territorial waters Sites of special scientific interest Marine Management Organisation Marine conservation zones Jet skis
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk