Proceeding contribution from Lord Judd (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
Before the Minister winds up this discussion, it might be of interest for the Committee to know just what the noble Baroness’s position is. She has done a masterly job in presenting the case as the network wanted, but also clearly distancing herself from all the possible implications of that amendment. It would be immensely helpful if the noble Baroness, with whom I frequently find myself in complete agreement, could clarify whether she will vote for or against, or abstain from, the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c74GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Dental services Data protection Admissions Asylum Contamination Blood Hospitals Health services Fees and charges Donors Health insurance HIV/AIDS Income General practitioners Hospital beds Haemophilia NHS Patients Organs Overseas visitors NHS foundation trusts Statistics Waiting lists Standards Transport Transplant surgery Tax allowances Revenue and Customs Department of Health Spinal injuries
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:06:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_539590
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_539590
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_539590