Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Paul Farrelly (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Business Rate Supplements Bill.


Business Rate Supplements Bill

We had a thorough discussion in Committee, but I still have a question about eligibility to vote on BRS schemes and whether the regulations might give local authorities flexibility to allow businesses that actually pay rates to participate, rather than those that are simply liable to pay a charge. On Second Reading, I used the example of a local Conservative councillor who operates three public houses in Newcastle-under-Lyme and who, over six years, has avoided paying business rates. He has not been disciplined in any way. The council does not respond to freedom of information requests but it has confirmed to me that, yet again, his businesses are substantially in arrears. Quite apart from the fact that an elected representative should set an example, my question is whether, in those circumstances, the regulations might give local authorities the discretion to say "You will not be able to participate and therefore influence a BRS scheme if you do not pay your business rates."


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
489 c360 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Companies Business Contributions Elizabeth line Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Local government Local government finance Rates and rating Property Business rates Tax allowances Tenants Tax rates and bands Business improvement districts
Legislation
Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk