Proceeding contribution from Andrew Mackinlay (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Coroners and Justice Bill.
Coroners and Justice Bill
Can my hon. Friend explain the need for clause 5(2), which, to avoid doubt, says:""subsection (1)(b) is to be read as including the purpose of ascertaining in what circumstances the deceased came by his or her death"?" With his human rights and lawyer's background, can he explain to us why it is imperative to include that provision and how deficient it will be if it does not extend to Northern Ireland?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 490 c87
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Data protection Crime prevention Courts Armed forces Death Coroners Juries Evidence Judges Legal representation Immunity certificates Foreign relations National security Northern Ireland Protection Parliamentary scrutiny Public inquiries Scotland Standards Terrorism Witnesses High Court
- Legislation
- Coroners and Justice Bill 2008-09
- Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (Scotland) Act 1976
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:54:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_543424
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_543424
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_543424