Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

When I looked at these amendments, I could not believe my eyes. So many complications have emerged about who does what in which bit of the sea. It is rather alarming. Have fishermen’s associations agreed to this? When a boat is approached and argues that it is not where the officer approaching it claims that it is, what happens? Is there an argument at sea, perhaps on a rough day with a howling gale? Boats drift sideways and are sometimes not dead sure where they are. It seems to be a weak part of the Bill. I do not see how the Minister can get round it, because it is built in to what has been agreed with the devolved Administrations. We have the added complication that in Scotland Ministers now refer to everything as "Scottish waters" and, to some extent, the Scots are being allowed to have them for some purposes. It is very complicated. Is the Minister content that the fishermen have agreed to this?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c864-5 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Animal welfare Coastal areas Devolution Crown immunity Cycling Cross border cooperation Finance Fees and charges Fisheries Licensing Enforcement Ferries Horse riding Functions Estuaries Ports Public footpaths Nature conservation Staff Training Safety Rights of way Seas and oceans Walking Angling Climbing Natural England Marine Management Organisation
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk