Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
"Relieved", he says. I think I understand his second answer, which is that the wording is there to make it clear that the primary mechanism—the main mechanism, in most cases—will be a declaration under Clause 2(3A) of the CROW Act. Am I right, though, that subsection (6) does not mean that other methods are not allowed, and that the Secretary of State and Natural England could use other methods if, in exceptional circumstances, they thought that it was the best way to do it—specifically, those methods under subsections (5)(b) and (c)?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c902
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Animal welfare Coastal areas Devolution Crown immunity Cycling Cross border cooperation Finance Fees and charges Fisheries Licensing Enforcement Ferries Horse riding Functions Estuaries Ports Public footpaths Nature conservation Staff Training Safety Rights of way Seas and oceans Walking Angling Climbing Natural England Marine Management Organisation
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:50:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544606
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544606
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544606