Proceeding contribution from Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
I accept the noble Lord’s explanation and acknowledge that I may have been confused by his rhetoric. There should be balance between these factors. I agree with the wording that suggests that paragraph (a) is the most important and (b) and (c) are objectives which, while important, should not be sought at the expense of (a). I agree with the Government’s wording here.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c941
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Animal welfare Coastal areas Devolution Crown immunity Cycling Cross border cooperation Finance Fees and charges Fisheries Licensing Enforcement Ferries Horse riding Functions Estuaries Ports Public footpaths Nature conservation Staff Training Safety Rights of way Seas and oceans Walking Angling Climbing Natural England Marine Management Organisation
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:47:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544666
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544666
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544666