Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill [HL].
Postal Services Bill [HL]
I thank the Secretary of State for his response and the noble Lord, Lord O’Neill, for his interesting intervention. I am sure that many Members of the Committee will be grateful for the Secretary of State repeating his assurance that the Government do not intend any further post office closures. I am also grateful for his explanation of definitions, which we will look at again carefully. For the moment, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 31 withdrawn. Amendments 32 and 33 not moved. Clause 14 agreed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c977-8
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Contracts Industrial relations Finance Liability EU law Insolvency Government assistance Government shareholding Private sector Pensions Partnerships Post offices Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Regulation Voting rights Technology Royal Mail TNT
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:54:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544950
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544950
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_544950