Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill [HL].
Postal Services Bill [HL]
My noble friend is right that it was not as good news as on the previous amendment. I was rejoicing in the fact that for once I had agreement from the Secretary of State, but that seems now to have got a little muddy. I know that it was not intentional, and I have already paid tribute to the expertise of my noble friend Lord McKenzie and to his grasp of these matters. I will need to look at what has been said, together with what was said earlier about additional voluntary contributions. I will probably come back with something more succinct and perhaps more acceptable to the Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c1022
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Contracts Industrial relations Finance Liability EU law Insolvency Government assistance Government shareholding Private sector Pensions Partnerships Post offices Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Regulation Voting rights Technology Royal Mail TNT
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:43:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545027
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545027
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_545027