Proceeding contribution from Mark Prisk (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 April 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill.
Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill
The annual report can be helpful, but as the Minister will understand and Members on both sides of the House will appreciate, when we are considering an order for an increase of the not-insubstantial sums identified in clause 1, it will be helpful if we can see the current point when we debate the issue in Committee. That—not simply the annual report—was what my point was about. Does the Minister not accept that that would improve the quality of scrutiny in the House?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 491 c157
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Finance Exports Industry Grants Export credit guarantees Government assistance UK Export Finance EU grants and loans Motor vehicles Loans Overseas investment
- Legislation
- Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:01:05 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_548351
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_548351
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_548351