Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.


Political Parties and Elections Bill

I am sympathetic to the thrust of the amendments, which have been thoughtfully put together. I am at slight loggerheads with my party, whereas I totally agree that the amendments would be very difficult to impose and would give us greater policing difficulty. One has to respect the fact that a lot of thought has gone into this—a lot of practical thought, given the experience of the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, has on these matters. The particular point that I may be at loggerheads with my party on is the back-counting of 365 days for adding up the total election expenditure. At the last election, great strain was put on parties, considering that in that back-counting you had to include the cost of the European elections and the local elections. The decision as to when the election is called and the back-counting totally favours the incumbent, and this cannot be fair in the current electoral system. Another system of establishing the period during which the total spending limit for an election is allowed has to be rethought. Some of the amendments have a stab at that, and I hope that the Minister might consider looking at this issue again during this Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c205GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Costs Finance Elections Donors Expenditure Electoral Commission Members Political parties Loans Regulation Trade unions Tax allowances Taxation
Legislation
Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk