Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Michael Mates (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on Intelligence and Security Committee.


Intelligence and Security Committee

If the hon. Gentleman will just shut up for a minute, I will explain what happens. It is then the Committee's job to go through those suggested redactions and ensure that every one is justified. In every case that I can remember, we have had the agencies back in and said to them, "Justify this. Justify that. Justify the other." They then withdraw their objections to some things, which are published. The real point is that we have a deterrent. It has never happened in my 15 years on the Committee, but if there were a redaction with which we disagreed because we did not think it was about national security, we would put in the report, "We wished to publish this, but the Government refused to allow it." I do not think that any Government could live with that, and I am not making a party point. It is done by agreement, but we look rigorously at the whole issue.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
492 c408 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
ICT Accountability Intelligence services Internet Intelligence and Security Committee National security Parliamentary scrutiny al Qaeda Espionage Joint Intelligence Committee Terrorism
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk