Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 1 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
My Lords, I will not repeat what my noble friend has so clearly said, but the issue has been raised with me on several occasions. One such provision in particular, if it were so moved, would affect a wildlife sanctuary, which is clearly undesirable. I hope that the Minister will be able to give assurances to my noble friend. I know that we are not in Committee, so we cannot come back again, but I formally support this important amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c26
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Birds Coastal areas Devolution Crown dependencies British overseas territories Cycling Coastal erosion Land Leisure Gun sports Environment protection Exemptions Horse riding Isle of Man Gibraltar Internet International law Estuaries Local government Ownership Parking Planning permission Planning Ports Privacy Public transport Maps Public footpaths Nature conservation Parish and town councils National parks Public inquiries Safety Rights of way Seas and oceans Wildlife Planning Inspectorate Jersey Guernsey Natural England
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:43:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_562171
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_562171
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_562171