Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 June 2009. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
Moved on or perhaps moved back—I am not sure. Has my noble friend any research evidence based on pilots, pathways or anything else to show whether the additional premium has been attractive and effective in delivering the outcomes of the programmes he seeks? Usually we do that and usually we find that it works. Can my noble friend share any such information with us?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c347GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Staff Disability Childcare Carers Advisory services Childminding Women Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Jobcentres Domestic abuse Interviews Income Jobcentre Plus Earnings rules Home education Mental illness Medical treatments Pilot schemes Parents Lone parents Social security benefits Social security Welfare tax credits Schools Special educational needs Training Unemployed people Labour market Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-30 11:27:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569096
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569096
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569096