Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 June 2009. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
Would not my noble friend welcome having in his back pocket the possibility at some stage down the line of introducing an additional work-related premium, so that if it was thought desirable it would not depend on primary legislation but could be introduced, possibly after consultation? If he were willing at this stage not to go for this amendment—I accept that he is not going to do that—but to use his best endeavours to come back at Report with an agreement or statement to the effect that regulations would be possible to cover this, should it be shown to be desirable in future, I would be content. Would he do that?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c348-9GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Staff Disability Childcare Carers Advisory services Childminding Women Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Jobcentres Domestic abuse Interviews Income Jobcentre Plus Earnings rules Home education Mental illness Medical treatments Pilot schemes Parents Lone parents Social security benefits Social security Welfare tax credits Schools Special educational needs Training Unemployed people Labour market Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-30 11:27:17 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569100
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569100
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569100