Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 June 2009. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
I do not think that the Committee disagrees about the need to ensure that vulnerable people do not unwittingly find themselves pursued for fraud or anything else. I think we have common agreement on that. The noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, made the point that customer error would typically be dealt with elsewhere in the jobcentre and would not come into the section that looks at the possibility of fraud. Clearly there has to be sufficient evidence to prosecute. Where someone had misunderstood the rules, particularly if they had been advised by Jobcentre Plus that what they were doing was in order, it would be quite difficult to see fraud being considered in those circumstances.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 712 c65GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Staff Complaints Disability Contracts Appeals Carers Community care Advisory services Community care grants Housing benefit Fraud Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Jobcentres Eligibility Income Jobcentre Plus Earnings rules Mental illness Pilot schemes Personal savings Pensions Payments Loans Lone parents Standards Social security benefits Maternity benefits Social security Social Fund Training Take-up Unemployed people Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-30 11:06:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_571889
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_571889
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_571889