Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 June 2009. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

I thank my noble friend for that helpful intervention. On the issue of administrative penalties, an individual would have 28 days to change their mind and withdraw acceptance of an administrative penalty if, on reflection, they thought it was inappropriate. The noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, asked whether fraud arises only when payments have been made. The answer is that there generally needs to be an overpayment. The only instance where we prosecute without an overpayment is in relation to identity fraud. I hope that I have been able to convince the Committee why these provisions are appropriate. I also acknowledge that if evidence is provided to us that the system is not working, we will be very happy to look at it. Clause 21 agreed. Schedule 4 agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c66GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Staff Complaints Disability Contracts Appeals Carers Community care Advisory services Community care grants Housing benefit Fraud Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Jobcentres Eligibility Income Jobcentre Plus Earnings rules Mental illness Pilot schemes Personal savings Pensions Payments Loans Lone parents Standards Social security benefits Maternity benefits Social security Social Fund Training Take-up Unemployed people Employment and support allowance
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk